**Session Date/Time:** 22 Jul 2024 22:30 # mops ## Summary The Media Operations (MOPS) working group meeting covered updates on working group documents, an overview of the Media over Quick (MoQ) working group, an analysis of Real-Time Communication (RTC) application protocol usage, and the operational impacts of network overlays on media platforms. The meeting concluded with a discussion about adopting a draft outlining these impacts within the MOPS working group. ## Key Discussion Points * **Working Group Document Updates:** Updates were provided on the status of the extended reality application use case document and the Treatian document, both progressing through the RFC Editor and IESG queues respectively. * **MoQ Update (Alan Frindell, Meta):** * MoQ aims to unify low-latency video conferencing and high-scalability live streaming using Quick and WebTransport. * Key components include Media Over Quick Transport (pub-sub), low overhead container format, and a catalog for manifest-like functionality. * Design decisions include an object model (tracks, groups, objects), relay architecture, and transport mapping flexibility (streams vs. datagrams). * Prioritization mechanisms involve subscriber and publisher input, inter-track and intra-track (fidelity vs. freshness) priorities. * Multiple implementations are in development, with interoperability events planned. * **Analysis of RTC Application Protocol Usage (Wu, Penn, Peking, Zau):** * RTC applications often deviate from RFC standards, using proprietary extensions and multiplexing protocols. * FaceTime, Discord, Zoom, Messenger, and WhatsApp were analyzed on iOS. * Key findings include protocol multiplexing in a single UDP session (Quick, RTP, STUN), proprietary RTP header extensions, filler packets (Zoom), and custom STUN implementations. * Messenger was found to be closest to RFC standards. * The lack of standards compliance hinders code sharing, monitoring, and research. * **Operational Impacts of Network Overlays (Glenn Deen, Comcast):** * Network curabilizations (e.g., Apple Private Relay) modify network policies (DNS, routing) and affect CDN cache selection, geolocation, and authentication. * Changes in routing paths introduce latency, conflicting with the demand for low-latency live sports streaming. * Applications often lack transparency regarding the network policies applied by overlays. * Potential mitigation strategies include best practices guides, studies on the operational impact of privacy enhancements, and collaboration with other working groups. * HTTP vs. HTTPS routing differences were discussed, with emphasis on the potential for unexpected behavior due to Private Relay applying only to HTTP in some cases. * The importance of both platform and network overlay implementers to follow standards for media transport and peering was discussed. ## Decisions and Action Items * **MOPS Working Group Adoption:** The MOPS working group agreed, via a show of hands, to adopt the draft on unexpected consequences of network overlays as a work item to flush out the list of consequences. ## Next Steps * Glenn Deen will continue working on the "Unexpected Consequences of Network Overlays" draft, incorporating feedback from the MOPS working group and potential co-authors. * Explore further collaboration with other relevant IETF working groups to address the challenges posed by network overlays.