**Session Date/Time:** 07 Nov 2024 13:00 # deepspace ## Summary This IETF Birds of a Feather (BoF) session explored the potential for chartering a working group focused on IP-based space networking, particularly for lunar and potentially Martian environments. Presentations highlighted use cases, challenges related to long delays and intermittent connectivity, and potential areas of work. A revised charter proposal was discussed, and community feedback was gathered through informal polls regarding scope and interest. ## Key Discussion Points * **Scope of "Deep Space":** The name "deepspace" is a misnomer. Initial deployments are focused on lunar networking, with potential extensions to Mars. The focus is on IP-based space networks, complementing DTN (Bundle Protocol). * **Use Cases:** Presentations highlighted IP-based networks planned for lunar orbiters, habitats, rovers, and Earth-Moon links. Commercial lunar service providers are emerging. * **Challenges:** * Long, variable delays (e.g., Earth-Moon: 1.3 seconds one-way; Earth-Mars: 8-45 minutes one-way). * Intermittent connectivity due to orbital dynamics. * Need for interoperability between lunar and terrestrial networks and with DTN-based networks. * Address assignment and management on the lunar surface. * Appropriate transport protocols for long RTTs and disconnections. * Adaptation of application protocols with timeouts and flow control mechanisms. * Time synchronization across networks. * **Architecture Considerations:** * Storage and forward mechanisms at Layer 2 or Layer 3 to handle intermittent connectivity. * Buffer management and provisioning. * Considerations for IPV6 and different transports apart from TCP. * Potential use of transport proxies (e.g., QUIC proxies) and MASQUE. * Avoiding DNS resolution over deep space links through pre-fetching and caching. * **Charter Discussion:** * Debate on whether to include Mars in the initial scope. * Clarification of "end-to-end" in the context of space networks. * Whether it should be focus on low complexity communications. ## Decisions and Action Items * **Action Item:** Chairs to revise the charter proposal based on community feedback. Revisions will consider: * Refining the description of the scope to accurately represent space agencies' plans. * Clarifying whether the working group will evaluate and contrast rather than write the IP architecture, with consideration of an adaption. * Clarifying that the work focuses on scenarios with potential direct point to point communication possibility. * Specifying whether existing protocols will be profiled, or extended. * Refining the description of the scope to more accurately represent space agencies plans. * Adding Security to the area of work. * Referencing security framework other than TLS as options. * Review whether working group should focus on quick or additional protocols. * **Decision:** To take charter refinement efforts to the mailing list for further discussion and finalization. ## Next Steps * Chairs will circulate a revised charter proposal on the mailing list. * Community to provide feedback on the revised charter. * The Area Director (AD) and IESG will assess community support for the charter and determine whether to charter a working group.